Landowner / EnCana MeetingA landowner
meeting was held on the 9th of October. Approximately 30 people were in
attendance. Of these, 11 were representatives of EnCana, including: Joel Fox
(Team Lead, South Pieceance), Dave Grisso (Field Operations Supervisor,
South Pieceance), and Sher Long
together with four of her team from the Land Owner Relations
department. 16 landowners were present representing 9 families. At my
request, Tresi Houpt
(Garfield County Commissioner); Judy Jordan (Garfield County Oil and
Gas Liaison) and, Jim Rada (Garfield County Environmental Health Manager) were also
present.
At the meeting, EnCana revealed their projections
for the following fifteen months, which includes the development of 40 wells in
the nearby vicinity (map forthcoming). I am waiting to receive a letter and
map from Sher Long which should confirm and better determine their specific
locations and number.
Various landowners voiced a number of concerns
regarding EnCana's operations, to which Joel Fox and Dave Grisso,
responded by briefing landowners on a number of recent improvements to
operations. Those improvements include the installation of a new type of combustor
(Type: TBD) on all local well pads with their condensate
tanks plumbed to gather and capture escaping VOCs. Dave Grisso noted that
the combustors are 98%
effective. He further assured landowners that EnCana uses a type of gas separator
which, because of the use of telemetry monitoring equipment, is required not
to leak. Dave assured me, in
particular, that EnCana was not going to use drilling pits in their operations
here. They were further going to utilize a new coil rig (one of only two
currently available) on at least some of their operations. The coil rig is
apparently faster and will emit less emissions. Of the facing pits, Tim
Baer (Drilling Manager) noted that EnCana recycled it's fracing fluids,
reclaiming approximately 40-60%. Dave noted that EnCana has in place and is
adding more water pipelines at pad sites in order to reduce some of the greatest
truck traffic impacts.
In my opinion, these advances demonstrate EnCana's
new-found commitment to better practices and places them light years ahead
of where they were in terms of both physical operations and philosophy four
years ago. Even though 40 wells are, in my opinion, an atrocity - given the
associated, anticipated air pollution and its unknown health effects - I stated during
the meeting that we as landowners were damn lucky that EnCana is the
operator developing these wells. I believe this for two reasons: They are a
company 1) savvy enough to recognize the end-value of good relations and
best practices, and 2) in a position to invest in that corporate strategy. A
company with lesser resources might presume a greater value in cutting
corners and disregarding landowner concerns.
I truly hope this translates
into more concern for the wildlife that share our environment, but to date,
there appear to be no plans to delay development of the Schwartz site -
despite a letter I sent asking EnCana and the state to take the migrating
elk herd into consideration. To read the letter,
click here.
I noted to Joel, that given the stage he set during the
meeting - that is, recounting EnCana's commitment to better practices - my
expectations of EnCana are high.
Despite EnCana's assurances of better practices and
an investment in state-of-the-art equipment, there remained persistent
landowner concerns, voiced by an array of neighbors. These included: water well pollution; air emissions;
traffic (volume and reckless behavior) and dust; the potential for drug use
among contractors; the need for 'third-party' water sampling (that is, sampling
performed by a service provider not retained by EnCana); noise
pollution; light pollution; and littering.
Joel and Dave both acknowledged that contractor
management is a shared concern, but Sher noted that EnCana has instituted a
program with other operators whereby word of poor performers is communicated
with the hope of discouraging this type of contractor from simply relocating
to a new job site under a new operator. Dave also noted that EnCana engages
in drug testing. Dave suggested dust control by means
of MagChloride. I raised the question of an alternative due to the
toxic effects of MagChloride and its tendency to erode vehicle
undercarriages. Dave noted a pine tar substance which contained
approximately 80% MagChloride. He also stated that EnCana had tested
soy bean oil applications and found them to be ineffective. Joel noted that
efforts would be made to mitigate light pollution by installing cone-like
baffles over the rig lights, but noted the importance of worker's safety and
the need to maintain appropriate lighting directed at pad activities.
Relative to neighbor's concerns of water well
contamination, Joel pointed out that fracing operations were generally
conducted hundreds of feet below the level of domestic wells. However, as we
have seen in the Divide Creek Seep situation, fracing operations can
unintentionally extend beyond computer models and contribute to
communication with surface areas. Tim noted that in local fracing
operations, EnCana planned to use a fracing fluid which contained a biocide; an anti-scale agent;
a surfactant; polyacrylamide ( used to increase viscosity); sand; and,
water. I have long been concerned that the practice of fracing can
contribute to unintended subsurface-to-surface disturbance and consequently
a greater potential for seep creation, the creation or exacerbation of
existing fault networks, etc. I've asked to review the
hazardous information sheet on each agent.
Relative to air emissions, I raised the question of pipelines installed to
carry condensate out of the area, thereby reducing the chance of escaping
emissions from storage facilities. Several years ago, we were told
that EnCana was planning to go "tankless". Dave said they are considering
this as a possibility.
In discussing possible sources of air pollution
during the course of this proposed intense development, it became apparent
that a very important weak link in emission control remains flaring (the practice
of igniting raw natural gas during operations). Joel noted that flaring is the
agreed upon industry standard to reduce, by as much as currently possible, emissions
during a particular phase of operations.
Of course, as some of the photos from the
image
gallery will show, flaring combustion is often incomplete, resulting in particulate
matter and other pollutants released into the atmosphere. Joel was unable to predict the number
of flaring operations which may occur with any particular well, but noted
that some should be expected. As natural gas development takes on new
economic significance, new technologies come on-line continually, improving
current practices. Clearly, there is a need for a better method of capturing
or disposing
of escaping gas. And, probably, there is a financial incentive for industry
to do so. Until, however, a greater emphasis is placed upon human health and
safety and environmental integrity, this method may remain the inefficient,
ineffective and insidious standard.
On discussing issues of air emissions, Jim Rada noted there are no
safe ambient air threshold standards set by the EPA for
benzene, toluene, and many other related VOC compounds. Garfield County is
currently involved in a two year ambient air quality study [more information
regarding this study can be found on Garfield County's website:
http://www.garfield-county.com. When I
first learned of EnCana's plans for this area, I approached Jim and EnCana
suggesting that this situation may offer unique opportunities for air
monitoring - in that we have a current low-impact area which has become the
focus of intense development. All phases of operations could be examined in
an effort to better isolate specific activities which contribute the
greatest to air quality degradation (which is known to occur at varying
levels where drilling and gas recovery activities take place). The results of such a
plan could benefit the environment, the landowners, the county and other
regulatory bodies, as well as industry.
I am hoping that both EnCana and the county can quickly and cooperatively
engage in an air monitoring program, as such an arrangement would help
demonstrate industry concern for environmental and citizen health issues --
and, under the best circumstances, yield valuable data in recognizing
specific activities which contribute to air quality degradation.
During the meeting, I noted that my mother - a
landowner resident - has, in the past (note image gallery), experienced
problems with her eyes excreting mucosa and becoming gummy during venting
and flaring operations. Fortunately, those events were intermittent and the
condition was temporary, though no less disruptive and frightening. In the
absence of air monitoring which can pro-actively detect the presence of
hazardous constituents and demonstrate a greater need for emission controls,
she, unfortunately is the equivalent of our canary in the mine. I hope that
the county, the state, the federal government and industry recognize the
value in determining the presence of hazardous constituents in an
environment shared by humans and wildlife alike. I hope they are prepared to
acknowledge the effect these constituents can have on human health. And I
hope they are prepared to demonstrate a commitment to mitigating these
effects and preserving healthy air quality standards, such as we now enjoy -
but that is becoming increasing degraded throughout our broader river valley
region - attributable, in large part, I believe, to the proliferation
of natural gas drilling and recovery activities.
EnCana Air Emissions Information
Last week, prior to the hearing in Grand Junction,
Sher shared information on EnCana's efforts to reduce air emissions.
According to the information: "EnCana is a new member of the EPA Natural Gas
STAR Program. Gas Star is a voluntary program to reduce methane flaring and
venting. To date we have replaced 40% of our pneumatic pumps with solar
operated pumps. Reduced flaring and venting volumes by 64% during completion
operations through "green completion" practices. 2006 EnCana Diesel
Consumption: 78% of diesel combusted in 2006 was low sulfur diesel. 21% of
diesel combusted in 2006 was ultra low sulfur diesel. Resulted in an 67%
reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions. EnCana has installed 36 voluntary
combustors which have reduced our VOC's by 30% in the Mamm Creek field."
Oil and Gas Liaison Tours the Area
During mid-week, I and Judy Jordan, (Garfield County
Oil and Gas Liaison) toured the region within which the 40 wells have been
proposed. During this tour, Judy became acquainted with existing wells,
newly proposed well locations, landowner locations and the location of the
Divide Creek seep.
Relatively new to the position of liaison (which is
a neutral, primarily communication/reporting function), I appreciate Judy's
efforts at orienting herself with the physical characteristics of the area
and anticipated activities. Should there be an unintended event which
negatively impacts residents, Judy is likely to be among the first summoned
to the scene. Judy and I shared the view that our time spent surveying the
area should help enhance her ability to respond quickly and efficiently.
Tips from Environmental Health Manager on
Reporting Odor Events In a conversation
with Jim Rada this week I asked if he could recommend pointers on making
citizen reporting of complaints more efficient for responding officials.
These are the factors he suggesting making a note of during odor events. I
will post these on this site under reporting authority's contact information
posted on the Stand Tall page:
Take note of the following as much as possible:
Meteorological Conditions
temperature
wind direction
general wind speed: i.e. calm, breezy, gusty, etc.
Event Specifics
time of occurrence
duration of occurrence Topographical
Conditions
lay of the land, tree density, etc.
Note the presence of any known wells in the vicinity,
and type of activity if known
I've not yet spotted the elk
Several times this week I've been out and about at
or near dawn; yet, I've not personally seen the elk which have purportedly
come down from the high country. It's actually not uncommon for the herd to
merely flirt with lower elevations before committing to them for the
duration of the winter season.
View a panorama of
Summerhawk Valley (just West of the Swartz site under development). In
the winter, the elk visit Summerhawk and, there, find water from Divide
Creek, some forage and shelter.
Post Independent Article
Midweek, I was contacted by Dennis Webb of the Post
Independent regarding news of the 40 proposed wells. His article appeared in
the Post [Oct 13, 2007] "Plans for 40 gas wells near 2004 gas seep worry
resident".
Added to the site this week
A new site map and
contact information for landowners potentially
affected by EnCana's operations. |