|
2008 Divide Creek Seep 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
|
| Entry - 08-28-08
|
COGCC sampling efforts only a ruse? COGCC showed up about an hour late which was no big deal since I was just out nosing around the seep site, but when the Environmental Specialist [ES] showed up, I was blown away by his behavior. When I saw him approach, I waved him over to where I had been waiting and warned him of the uneven ground in the high weeds as he approached. When he got there, I said I was going to show him the areas of impact. He had not been to this site since last winter, had not been there since the beaver pond washed away and had not seen any of the impacts from the seep discovered on June 28th. Immediately, he was confrontational and began shouting and said he didn't have time for that, that "this is not a science project." I said, "Yes, it is a science project, and here is where the gas was, and the seep was, and so on...." He said he was sick of dealing with me and was sorry if I didn't think I was getting enough attention. Like I live for this crap. At that point it was very clear that he was either trying to intimidate me, or instigate a confrontation. I keyed the walkie talkie so family members back at the house could hear what was being said, and I asked the ES to just stop. I asked him to stop for three reasons: 1) I didn't want him to continue to berate me, 2) I didn't want him to say something he would regret and 3) I didn't want him to continue in such a manner until there was another person present to witness it. He said he didn't have time to play games. I said, I am not playing games, but if you're going to behave this way, I want another person down here to witness it. He said "Bite me." Honestly. I don't know what he was thinking. In fact, as he walked away to apparently leave, I asked what was the matter with him. He wasn't profane, just rude, weird and acting stupid. At this time I also grabbed the video camera which had been lying near the frog in the grass. This person had spoken to me in such a way once before when I called and asked for a report over a year ago, but I wrote it off to him having a really bad day and simply taking it out on me. I hadn't forgotten it, however, which is why I picked up the video recorder and hit the record button. It was just he and I, and I wasn't about to be reproached, again and under such circumstances without a record of what was said. I don't know whether he knew I was recording the conversation or not, but for my purposes, I didn't know what might transpire and wasn't about to take any chances. He wasn't exactly behaving rationally. Anyway, I, once again asked him to just stop, and he said no, that I either listened now or he was leaving. So I listened, and on and on it went, as he continually asked me to show him where I wanted him to sample and I continued to try. Fortunately, by this time, a family member had overheard the "Bite me" and other choice comments, hurried down to the creek and observed the interaction personally. So unlike the COGCC Environmental Manager later claimed, there actually was a witness and it was recorded. It wasn't (this time) just his word against mine. As I continued to point things out, he continued to interrupt - at one point saying he didn't "have time for a stroll". Unfortunately, and not by my choosing, the seep has left its mark from one end of our property to the other and I had only walked some ten feet within the main area to demonstrate areas of black seepage, corroded rocks, gas and upwelling. He continued to try to explain away our observations by saying there was no proof, and there was just water and sand and dirt. It was all very frustrating and irrational, and I honestly didn't know what he expected of me. I continued to try to demonstrate areas, but he wouldn't listen and seemed to want to argue. I frankly - and this was probably my fault - just couldn't imagine him not wanting any context, or caring about what had happened - where occurrences had been, but are now altered or gone due a two-month delay in investigating. I really never anticipated anything like what happened, and obviously wrongly assumed that the COGCC came down to see what was up and judge the best place to grab their samples. He kept insisting that I show him proof, which was really frustrating since we've been knocking ourselves out trying to photograph and post the photos and write letters, and conduct presentations - it's just endless, and we don't know what else we can do. So, anyway, this went on, and I grew more impatient as I continually failed to see what it was he wanted me to do for him. He refused to test the water saying he wasn't going to dig twelve feet. I don't know where that number even came from, but the water table was probably only a few feet down. I thought he was prepared to dig - my mistake - again. Moving on.... At one point, he stressed that the COGCC had "bent over backward" to appease us.... had invested vast resources in "this seep", and "there has never been evidence of any impacts to your property!" he said. I was stunned. I said, "This is a new event! It has been four and half years since the seep in 2004, and back then, there were only four wells in the area - now, there are 20 new wells! He didn't seem to get it. And they are the agency that is supposed to oversee the drilling. With special emphasis on oversight since lifting the moratorium and allowing the drilling to recommence last year. But was there proper oversight? No. Had there been, our concerns that we raised then would have been taken seriously, and what we are dealing with now could have been avoided. He continued to express agitation for whatever reason as I continued - and probably shouldn't have - to try and explain where he might like to test and why. I thought that was what he wanted me to do, but it became more and more apparent that he didn't want me to do that. I didn't know what he wanted. I told him I wasn't the environmental specialist. I was trying to point out areas - like he asked - so that he, in his best judgment, could decide which areas would best meet his objectives. He didn't seem to get that at all. He didn't even seem to hear the words I was speaking. At one point I asked him if he would like to see the frog I found in the creek. I said it couldn't' move it's back legs. He said, "No. Frogs die every day. Birds die every day." It was pretty unreal. This was the environmental specialist from the agency which demands and enjoys sole, delegated jurisdiction over not only drilling activities but also human health and safety and environmental safety actually telling me he didn't want to know about or talk about or see this frog found that very morning in an area where gas is clearly saturated in the creek bed near the point of the 8-minute expression found earlier in the year. At one point earlier in the conversation, he said if I didn't want to work with them, then we could find somebody else. I reminded him his agency had jurisdiction. It was their job to protect the health and safety of people and the environment where drilling is involved. I was also becoming sarcastic by this point, but doing my level best - my level best - to accommodate him and get the sampling under way.. It just sucked. It was miserable, and I honestly don't have a clue why he behaved in such a way or what he thought would happen as a result. It almost seemed predetermined. So anyway, he kept getting more and more impatient, pushing for me to hurry and to just point out whatever. So, I did exactly as he asked. I walked to an area near where the frog had been found, and I pointed and said, "There's the soil. Sample it if you want to." Then he said, "You know what? I'm done. I'm not dealing with this." By this time, it was just so stupid, and I said, "Is this not what you asked me to do? I'm doing what you wanted me to do." He said, "You show us the evidence. You show us impacts." I said, "Fine, we'll find someone else to sample this." And he left. He walked away. I told him he had half an hour to get off the property and not to leave anything behind. I guess he told Dennis Webb - a Grand Junction Sentinel reporter - that I was uncooperative. Why in the world would we be uncooperative after struggling to try and get the COGCC to acknowledge problems from over a year ago and beating our heads against a wall for the last two months begging for testing in the face of overwhelming visual evidence? Why would we jeopardize that? We would not. That's the point. I would have dealt with anything to have the sampling conducted. It took the COGCC environmental specialist walking off the project to end any chance we had. All I did was give him a limited time to leave the property. But only after he walked away from the project. This has frequently been the manner in which we are treated by this agency, and it's no damn wonder we're so frustrated. How can a landowner prove impacts? We've done everything we possibly can. We can't afford those kinds of tests, and we can barely sleep and function now, trying to keep up with everything as it changes and post it and keep up with this website - so all the agencies can look at it in their offices at the same time. It's just ridiculous. We cannot do anything else. This consumes our lives, and there are about a billion other things I'd rather do right now. If the COGCC is so short-staffed and under budgeted and they're sick of dealing with me when I am only trying to tell them that impacts have occurred from the insane pace of drilling that they keep rubber stamping, then, good God, they need to slow down the permitting! Why blame the landowner? We sure as hell did not ask for this. We asked for sampling. But it looks like not only are we not going to get it, but it was never really even intended. Looking back, I think it's a little odd that no one else showed up even though at least one person expressed dismay that they had been invited and were supposed to have been asked to accompany COGCC on the tour. It's also a little strange that the Environmental Manager assumed there weren't any witnesses. This is the same person who told the County Commissioners that CO2 wasn't used to frac Schwartz in 2004 - even though documentation demonstrates otherwise. Here's Dennis' article:
"Silt resident, environmental specialist disagree about
effects of drilling" |
Entry 08-31-08
|
Seep Update Dead wildlife There were two other dead bird incidents, but I didn't include them here because although they occurred within days of these critters dying, there is enough speculation that they may have succumbed to other causes as to be reserved. They, however, showed no overt signs of injury.
New South Seep [08-22-08 and 08 28-08] The week prior to the sampling effort agreed to by the COGCC, we discovered another area of seeping - at the opposite (North) end of our property. It was a small area of surface anomalies - maybe 2' X 3', but the vegetation in the nearby area is in significant decline. There was a small amount of biofilm in this area, but, if this area mimics what we've seen at the main site it appears that time has diminished what may have been visible. I believe this is all the same event - just different points of exit, suggesting it is far more widespread than we fist believed.
The photo above shows foam from the newly discovered seep site on the far south of our property. We saw big chunks of foam like this during the 2004 Schwartz blowout. EnCana uses surfactants (soap) in their drilling operations. We don't know what causes these chunks, but they persist in impacted areas. Surfactants are the only substances I know of that foam, but other chemicals in agitation could perhaps do so also. Since we had a couple of days of rain after this photo was taken on the 22nd, I worried that this foam chunk would be gone the morning the COGCC was supposed to come out to sample.
From black seep area [08-28-08]
Beaver Hootch and 2008 Main Seep
Area
Iron-reducing bacteria still lurks under the bank near the beaver hootch [08-28-08] Meanwhile, across the creek on the
opposite bank, gas expresses from underground. in the same area where a
partially paralyzed frog was found the same day. click here to view video from
08-28-08 which
shows bubbling in creek bed with another, larger and apparently unimpaired
frog nearby. From area where paralyzed frog
was discovered and rescued
Area near waterfall - just maybe 20 feet upstream of 2008 main seep site and two ponded areas. [08-30-08]
Adjacent to Ponded Areas at 2008 Main Seep Site
After the COGCC instigated a confrontation and walked off the sampling project that was to have finally commenced on August 28th, 2008, we found two new areas of evident impacts on our property, and another larger area nearby which is strongly suspect. Observations from these areas follow. Turkey Point [08-30-08] The following pictures are from the Turkey Point beaver pond area. The beaver left the area around two and a half weeks ago and have not returned. I finally had an opportunity to go check out the area and found two impact areas. Beaver are especially sensitive to environmental changes - a lot like frogs. Their sudden absence after weeks of building two new dams and reinforcing a third raised serious suspicions, which were later confirmed. I saw a small fish jump in the pond, crane tracks on the bank and one frog a little downstream of the dam, but in an impacted area - that was it. No other wildlife that I could detect. No sandpipers or dippers. This is a strong indication that there is something very amiss with this environment. These birds feed on frogs and fish. If they are poisoned, the birds get poisoned. It's a food chain effect. The sensitive, attuned and able-bodied leave the area. Others eventually perish.
Area across from domestic well (on eastern bank) The following are from an area nearly directly across from our domestic water well. This is also the area of the dead rabbit. Other areas like this - where heavy biofilm was present occupied a contiguous area maybe 6' X 20'.
Paralyzed Frog - "Spots" We found a partially paralyzed frog in one impact area, but the COGCC environmental specialist refused to look at it. The frog, after 48 hours of rehabilitation, later recovered and was released back into West Divide Creek. Unfortunately, there are no areas which are not suspect, so we can only hope the frog is able to somehow steer clear of dangerous areas. please see story below for picture and video links on paralyzed frog Later, on the afternoon of 08-30-08, I walked the creek bed to the 2004 "main seep" area - which is still active - and noted an area of impact that runs nearly the full length of a neighbor's property. Pictures from that walkabout follow.
Possible New Signs of Impacts a Mile Away After the 08-30-08 walkabout, I notified our neighbors of my observations. One neighbor confided that in a conversation a week ago, another neighbor shared that they were experiencing anomalies in their otherwise excellent aquifer. They suggested to the neighbor that the water was staining their sink different colors. I don't like to repeat hearsay, but in these kinds of situations, neighbors can be isolated from one another. Isolating people and information is an effective tactic favored by industry. One way to curtail community cohesion is to pit neighbor against neighbor. In our area, where industry has and continues to be such a force, this tactic has been successful, and not all neighbors speak to one another. So, considering the circumstances of this evolving seep situation, I'm going to discuss hearsay. However, I will note it for what it is, and should it prove later to be false - I will immediately correct it. On a drive to record the condition of the access lane (EnCana is on the move again), we noted several dead patches of vegetation in fields near vigorous bubbling in a small pond used to recharge a domestic water shared by two neighbors. The dead patches may simply be the result of un-irrigated areas. However, they were small and dispersed among other healthy, tall-grass areas. The bubbling is another matter. And while it may be 'biogenic' - its very likely that it is being fed by a different methane source. This is near an area where a neighbor's water well was so full of methane after the Arbaney kick and the Schwartz blowout that they had to leave the premises. EnCana later bought that property. So, the sudden appearance of vigorous bubbling in this little pond may seem benign on its surface, but the surface is not the only concern. It's what is occurring underground that should be the primary focus. These observations suggest even more strongly that the impacts we first encountered over a year ago and which were more comprehensively revealed on June 28th, are far larger and more sever than we first suspected. [pictures from this video are unavailable as our equipment has changed, and still shots are low resolution. I will try to get new video of this phenomenon however, this week.] The last time I saw this kind of vigorous bubbling
in a small pond was back during the 2004 seep on a neighbor's place probably
three miles away. The cedars around the pond had suddenly died as well as
those across the road - a whole hillside of them. Obviously, this pointed to
a methane seep. At the time, the COGCC was making some effort to determine
the extent of the 2004 seep in our area, and the infamous Amos area (well
blowout) - even further away was also under scrutiny. The neighbor's
property with the bubbling pond was the focus of big-time drilling (which
the owner shared a strong economic interest in). That particular pond was a stock
pond which was frequented by cattle. In the twenty years we've lived in the
area I'd never seen it bubble - let alone to such a degree. I don't doubt
that with decomposing manure it did not ever bubble, but it must have
been infrequent enough to not be of notice. I used to help this neighbor
pull calves and spent quite a bit of time around the area. When I notified
the COGCC of the sudden appearance of vigorous bubbling, the COGCC sampled
the pond and determined the gas was - again - biogenic. Around a week later the pond
was dozed in and the cedars burned in a fire. Strange coincidence you might
say. |
|
No matter how they begin, all of the really best stories have happy endings. Although we never expected this story to unfold the way it did, we invite you to follow it, because, frankly - it blew our socks off and I bet it will blow yours off too! I first found Spots, the leopard frog, on the morning of August 28th, 2008. The COGCC was late in arriving to sample West Divide Creek. Of course, this gave me additional time to nose around the seep area and see what had changed since I last checked it out. Video camera in hand, I scanned the area on the South bank of the creek. Gas bubbled up into the creek when I stood on rocks to cross through it. That, of course, got my attention. So I looked closer and saw lots of tiny vent holes where gas had been escaping for some time. Then a little frog caught my eye. And not in a good way.... Meet spots, the little frog struggling to make it bank-side while in the grip of what appeared to be partial paralysis and some kind of neurological impairment. He appeared to be a male given his shape, size and forelegs (which tend to be larger in females).
Spots the Super Frog - Part 1 - The Rescue
I knew the COGCC was visiting that morning to sample areas impacted by the seep discovered on June 28th, 2008. Frogs and other amphibians are very sensitive to environmental pollutants, so they are effective early indicators of neurotoxins and other kinds of chemical contamination. I wanted to show this little frog to the COGCC. Maybe they would have some idea of what was affecting him.... Spots gets situated in temporary housing and heads for the shade of tall grass as we wait for the COGCC.... Only an hour or so later, Spots was settled into his new digs - a CorningWare baking dish!
Spots the Super Frog - Part 2 - A
New Environment
But with some native mud, stones and water - plus some new water from the tap, Spots settled in. But wait! What if he was hungry? Surely he hadn't been able to hunt in such a condition. We looked around for a fly. Where are all the window-thumping flies of summer when you need one? Fortunately, twenty minutes of on-again, off-again hunting produced three flies that volunteered to be dinner. We served them up on a rock. Spots would have none of it. Spots was busy with the effects of what we later learned from a toxicologist was likely poisoning from something akin to a 'cide'.... that is, some kind of pesticide or herbicide - or, in the case of natural gas drilling - biocide.... an agent employed to kill micro-flora like algae's.... The oil and gas industry uses as many as 100 different biocides. Basic offshore drilling processes are very similar
to onshore processes. According to the helpful tutorial: "Waste discharges during the offshore oil
and gas activity", by Stanislav Patin (translation by Elena Cascio):
"The most widespread biocides used in the oil
and gas production practice include sodium salts of hypochlorite, formalin
releasers, and glutaraldehyde as well as biguanidine and quaternary
ammonium, and a number of other compounds. The composition of some compounds
is not always known. Some biocides are highly toxic. Many countries either
discourage (for example, in case of carbamates and thiocarbamates) or
prohibit (for example, in case of dichlorophenols and pentachlorophenates)
their use by the offshore oil and gas industry. Drilling discharges also
contain many heavy metals (mercury, lead, cadmium, zinc, chromium, copper,
and others) that come from components of both drilling fluids and drilling
cuttings. Chapter 6 gives the ecotoxicological assessments and comparison of
different drilling fluids and drilling cuttings."
Spots the Super Frog Part 3 -
Detoxification
Spots hung in there, but spent most of his time trembling and twitching. We thought Spots was a goner. An hour later, Spots trembled so badly, we thought he might be headed for the big grassy bank in the sky. But Spots still had a special twinkle in his eye, and we could tell he wasn't about to give it up yet. He just seemed determined somehow. Our hearts broke for him, we prayed for him. We stroked his fine, wet skin and asked the guardian angels to make him well again. The more I looked in on Spots and saw his efforts to overcome his condition, the more determined I became that "science" wouldn't take him from us. If they had, he would have been promptly dispatched. It seems that the scientific community can conduct few observations without having to do something in. Not Spots. "Come on Spots. You can beat this...." we said. I changed his water thinking that maybe he was detoxifying, and he could purge any toxins from his body by being immersed in clean water. It was worth a shot. Hours passed. We couldn't sleep at all. Spots either. It had been a pretty tough day, what with how the COGCC stuff went. So the kitchen light kept flipping on and off until 5:00 am into the next morning. That's not so good for a little critter used to night staying night and day staying day. So, we carried him off to the bathroom and tucked him in beneath a splatter screen from the kitchen. We wished him well. Little did we realize, the splatter screen did not form the best seal! Twenty minutes later we found our intrepid Spots making his way down the hall! He had leapt from his little house to the floor and was off searching for the creek. "Good grief!" A frog on the floor! Something in our brains said.... "Where did a frog come from?" It had been a very long day.... The dogs quickly advanced.... "Cripes! Hold the dogs!" We humped along the hall, chasing Spots down, and he hopped twice before I could grab him. His hoppers seemed back on track! It was a quick douse in the tap and back to bed, little man. He still twitched a bit. But his eyes twinkled even more merrily. Maybe it was just a massive adrenaline rush that carried him down the hall. Such an event would probably inspire such behavior in me! "Now go to sleep!" And we flipped the light off once again. Everyone caught a few hours sleep. As dawn broke over the kitchen table, I brought Spots in for observation. He seemed irritated. No trembling. Perhaps a bit hungry. Mostly, though, ready to get on with life back down at the creek. I could relate. I am not a very patient patient either. Hospitals give me the creeps. I wanted even more to take him back to his home. But, I wanted to be sure he was fully functional. He still hadn't eaten the flies. Frogs typically like live prey. Okay. Glucose is essential to life - it feeds the brain. Maybe, since frogs soak up stuff through their skin, I could sprinkle a wee tiny bit of sugar in the corner of Spot's house, and he could sort of absorb a little nutrition that way. I changed his water again, and in went a sprinkle of sugar. Within a couple of hours, Spots looked like he was ready to take on the whole world!
Spots the Super Frog - Part 4 -
I asked him to please have a little more patience as I dealt with stuff unfolding all around us. COGCC stuff. Now, Spots was just a captive. Poor Spots. He was ready to rock n' roll and get on down to the creek, but now... timing was not cooperating. I promised him I would take him to the creek in the morning, as long as he seemed to stabilize and held his own through one more night. Spots looked dubious but he indulged me nonetheless. I hoped he wouldn't hold it against me. I thought about his big release. He had earned it over and over again. To be free once again - to regain his mobility and strength and hop in the tall grass and swim in the cool waters and hunt water skippers and flies.... I wanted to give him his life back. We were overjoyed by his apparent recovery and everyone waited for Saturday morning! Well - we passed out and missed morning. But around noon I went out and in honor of Spots pending release caught two moths and two grass hoppers - and lay the feast before him. I had no sooner dropped in a stunned miller than Spots flashed his tongue out and BAM - breakfast was no more! Spots can hunt!! Whoohoo! We're hoping a hearty breakfast will ready him for his release in a few hours. Spots has taken on a coppery glow around his snout and head, and we hope it's not some indication of metals toxicity. Frogs are especially sensitive to such things - maybe his color is only changing because of his surroundings. We don't know. But what's been great is that he has recovered! In the beginning, my heart hurt so much for Spot's suffering. When I first found him I immediately suspected developmental retardation which can happen in contamination situations. But, it didn't make sense that he had gotten so big being so developmentally challenged. In most cases, he would have been unable to hunt and therefore starved, or he would have attracted predators by his vulnerable behavior and entered into the food chain, or, he simply might have long since drown from exhaustion - as exhibited in the way he was struggling to get to a reed and move onto the bank. Spots knew he was in trouble in the creek, but couldn't mobilize enough to get out. It was by the most amazing miracle we found him when we did, because after talking to a toxicologist, a whole other possibility arose: the possibility that he had been poisoned by whatever was in that environment, where he became stranded. We know there is gas saturation there, and who knows what all else that has come up with it. COGCC has all along tried to convince us that it's all biogenic. I said a year ago that such a conclusion was flawed. Not because a methane reading was inaccurate, but because the environmental assumptions were wrong. An in-stream beaver pond acts like a giant conversion tank. When hydrocarbons such as formation gases eek up into the environment and are collected in silt at the bottom of a pond, the silt inflates with gas and acts like a giant sponge, allowing microbes which naturally occur in soils and water to munch down big-time and proliferate. As they eat the hydrocarbons they poop out their own brand of methane, just like we do! The more bugs that show up, the more biogenic or micro-organism-generated methane is created! In fact, it's estimated that such conversations can take place at a thousand times per second in rich environments. Think I'm kidding about that? Check this out: Industry knows that if they inject these micro-organisms in a coal vein where there is a mix of hydrocarbons and water underground, these little bugs will off-gas a continuous production stream of recoverable methane. But one of the reasons this kind of microorganism production is not sought isn't because of some kind of technical problem. It's because in Canada where this technology is well known, farmers own all living things above, on, and beneath the ground (heaven to hell farming rights it's called). That means that industry would have to share profits with the lowly farmer. And that isn't about to happen. Industry wants it all. So when Spots was trembling and suffering, I could hardly stand it. We had called the DOW (no answer) and various toxicologists, but no one knew of anyone who handled such things. So, we waited, torn. Not knowing what to do, but focusing on this little guy's comfort, health and wellbeing. We changed his water, we fed him tiny amounts of sugar in his water, we waited and prayed. And as he got stronger and appeared more determined than ever to beat the odds of succumbing to apparent poisoning, we resolved this little guy was going back home, and would not become the focus of inquiring scientific minds. The elegant beauty of that is that we have video of what happened, we have a record of his recovery and the variables associated with it; and, most importantly, ultimately, we have this wonderful story of a little frog determined to survive and who has left us with a very happy ending.
Spots the Super Frog -
Part 5-A and 5-B - Seizing Freedom!
|
|
2008 Divide Creek Seep
|
|
Other Relevant Links |
Compare the 2004 Seep with the 2008 Seep with video (scroll down to Video section) Divide Creek Then - 2004 [Seep photos and information] Divide Creek 'Now' - 2007 [Prior to the seep event of June 28, 2008] Timeline of events [From January 2004 to present]
COGCC 2004 Divide Creek Seep Order (judgment) and Vital
Exhibit showing faulting. (in
particular, you may find paragraphs 10, 20, 30 and 73 of interest).
Dr. Geoffrey Thyne's (of Science Based
Solutions) presentation to Garfield County
Re: "Sumary of PI and PII Hydrogeologic Characterization Studies - Mamm Creek
Area, Garfield County, CO" This key
PowerPoint presentation and its companion conclusive report provide an outstanding perspective of the dynamics
at play between the hydrology and the geology of this area in particular as
it specifically relates to drilling operations and risks to water supplies.
Please look for these links at the following addresses: Conclusions - http://garfield-county.com/Index.aspx?page=1149
Garfield County
Incomplete List of Hydraulic Fracturing Constituents (with MSDS sheets)
Garfield County Gas Wells and Pipelines
COGCC Quarterly Complaint Reports Analysis of the West Divide
Creek Seep
|
|
Updates Canary
Watch Stand
Tall Image
Gallery |
|
All contents of this site, unless
otherwise noted are copyrighted by Lisa Bracken, 2007-2010 (or present). All rights are
reserved. |